In order to manage and improve quality, it is important to understand the cost of nonconformance and take the necessary steps to reduce its impact on your business!
Nonconformance can refer to any deviation from specifications or standards and can have a significant impact on businesses both financially and operationally.
In this article, we will discuss five ways to measure the cost of nonconformance in quality management. We will also explore the various types of costs associated with nonconformance, and how you can go about calculating them.
What are the 5 Ways to Measure the Cost of Nonconformance?
Quality management is a vital component of any business, as it ensures that products and services meet customer satisfaction.
When nonconformance occurs, however, there can be considerable costs incurred, but with proper planning and implementation strategies in place, companies can better manage their risks while still achieving high levels of product or service quality at an acceptable cost level too!
Below are five ways to measure the cost of nonconformance and how you can use a process approach to manage quality in your organization.
Recommended Books for Quality Management | Get a copy from Amazon |
Quality Management Demystified | Purchase or Learn More |
Effects of Conformance Costs Over Non-Conformance Costs: Importance of Quality Costs in the Food sector of Pakistan (Wall’s ice cream maker organization) | Purchase or Learn More |
Prevent Costly : NCRs and RCAs:: [NCRs = Non Conformance Reports; RCAs = Root Cause Analysis]: To Achieve The Best Performance in our: Personal, Commercial, Professional and Financial Life | Purchase or Learn More |
1. Measuring the Cost of Nonconformance through Lost Revenue
When products do not meet customer expectations due to poor quality or non-conformity, it can lead to revenue losses due to returns, refunds, or complaints. For example, if a product fails prematurely due to an assembly error, the company may have to cover the cost of replacement and shipping fees as well as lost sales from dissatisfied customers.
The true cost of nonconformance can be difficult to measure since it’s often hard to identify all the factors that contribute to it. However, lost revenue is one way to measure the cost of nonconformance.
Let’s say for example, you produce a product that fails prematurely due to an assembly error. This could result in lost sales from dissatisfied customers and increased costs for customer service, shipping fees, and replacement product costs. These are all measurable ways in which your company may be losing revenue due to the nonconformance issue.
Another way you may lose money due to nonconformances is if customers take their business elsewhere as a result of their dissatisfaction with your product or service. Negative word-of-mouth information sharing has the potential to wreak havoc on your business and cause lost revenue if customers begin complaining about inadequate quality control or unsatisfactory products or services.
Measuring the cost of lost revenue can provide valuable insight into how much money is being lost due to nonconforming products or services. It can also help you understand where improvements need to be made in order for your company’s products or services to meet customer expectations more consistently and reliably.
As such, measuring lost revenue is an important part of successfully managing projects and avoiding costly mistakes down the road. It is a great strategy for any project leader or business owner looking for ways to improve their bottom line, to understand how much money is being lost due to nonconforming products or services.
It can provide valuable insight into where improvement needs should focus when dealing with quality control issues and other forms of non-compliance across an organization’s product lines or service offerings.
Your risk management planning could include measuring this data accurately to address these problems before they occur and become too costly, ensuring that customer satisfaction remains high when you have to mitigate unnecessary losses in both time and money down the road.
2. Measuring Non-Conformance Costs Using Rework Cost Analysis
When it comes to the success of a project, cost management is key. Non-conforming products and services can have a negative effect on the bottom line, resulting in increased costs associated with labor, materials, tools, engineering changes, and product redesigns. But products and services can be reworked or redesigned in order to meet customer expectations.
What is Rework Cost Analysis?
Rework cost analysis is used to identify and measure the overall cost that an organization incurs when dealing with non-conformance issues related to its products and services. This includes both direct costs (labor, materials) as well as indirect costs (time investments such as engineering changes or product redesigns).
By understanding the scope of these costs, organizations can better identify areas where they need to improve their processes and procedures in order to reduce costly reworks.
How Does It Work?
When conducting a rework cost analysis, organizations must first review their current processes and procedures in order to determine which process steps are causing the most issues.
Once these problem areas are identified, organizations can then begin to look for solutions that will help reduce the amount of rework needed in order to achieve customer satisfaction. This could involve streamlining processes or investing in new tools or technologies that allow for more accurate production.
What are the benefits of Rework Cost Analysis?
The primary benefit of conducting a rework cost analysis is that it provides organizations with valuable insight into where non-conformances are occurring within the production process so that they can be addressed quickly and effectively.
Additionally, it enables a business to track progress over time by comparing previous results against current ones in order to assess any improvements they may have made since implementing new strategies or procedures.
Finally, it allows teams to measure their performance against industry standards so that they can gain a better understanding of how they compare relative to their peers.
Rework cost analysis is an invaluable tool for project leaders and managers who want to ensure their projects are not only successful but also profitable.
By understanding where non-conformance issues are most likely to occur within the production process and taking proactive steps toward rectifying them, businesses can save both time and money while still providing customers with high-quality products and services.
Having a rework cost analysis, as part of your project management tool kit you’ll be able to make informed decisions about how best to optimize your processes for maximum efficiency and profitability!
3. Measuring the cost of Nonconformance with Waste Disposal Costs
Poor quality products may need to be discarded rather than repaired or reworked depending on their level of non-compliance. When products are non-compliant, it often means taking additional steps to dispose of them properly.
These waste disposal costs include everything from cleaning up spills and hazardous material disposal fees to transportation and landfill charges for discarded goods.
How to measure the cost of Nonconformance with Waste Disposal Costs.
When it comes to measuring the cost of nonconformance, one of the most effective ways is through tracking waste disposal costs associated with poor-quality products.
Calculating the cost of nonconformance is often tricky because it consists of variables like customer dissatisfaction and decreased sales from product recalls or reworking. To make this easier, many organizations invest in measuring the cost of nonconformance by zeroing in on waste disposal costs instead.
This includes everything from cleaning up spills and disposing of hazardous materials to transporting and dumping items into landfills that cannot be reworked or repaired due to their level of noncompliance.
These expenses should be tracked over time so that you can identify any trends and make adjustments accordingly.
For instance, if you notice an increase in waste disposal costs related to poor-quality items over a certain period of time, you may need to address this issue more directly by investing more resources into quality improvement initiatives or implementing more stringent quality control measures across production processes.
Since these costs are easy to quantify, they often provide a more accurate picture of how much money is being lost due to poor-quality products or services.
Waste disposal costs are one-way organizations can measure the cost of nonconformance in their operations. While these costs may not provide an exact figure for how much money is being lost due to poor-quality products or services, they do provide a good starting point for assessing potential risks associated with noncompliance issues.
Get a One-hour Maxwell Leadership Training Support for your Team – Limited Spots Available
Contact me for a free virtual
lunch & Learn Today!
4. Measuring the cost of Nonconformance with Internal Auditing Costs
Quality audits are essential for tracking performance metrics and ensuring standards are met when producing goods or services so that they meet customer requirements.
Internal auditing costs include fee payments for third-party auditors, as well as any other expenses related to implementing audit processes within your organization’s operations – such as training and development activities and software licenses required for compliance purposes.
Internal nonconformance costs can be easily tracked with quality audits, and serve as a valuable measure of performance.
It can provide valuable insight into the overall efficiency of a supply chain- from raw materials procurement through to goods delivery- by identifying areas of non-compliance and potential cost-savings opportunities.
Internal auditing costs directly reflect how much a company is investing in maintaining conformance. Working with third parties to keep track of such costs makes it easier to ensure all supply chain procedures fit regulations and requirements.
5. Measuring the cost of Nonconformance through Customer Satisfaction Losses
Quality issues can lead to dissatisfied customers who not only stop buying from you but also spread negative feedback about your brand leading others away from purchasing your products/services, which leads to decreased customer loyalty, brand reputation damage, and reduced market share all leading back into lost revenue again.
When customers are unhappy, it is a definite sign that quality standards have been affected. This most often results in decreased customer satisfaction and loyalty, sometimes may tarnish a brand’s reputation, and may cause market share to drop.
The costs incurred in noncompliance can easily be calculated, calculating the cost of failed delivery times and non-functioning products.
What may be harder to note however are the less tangible costs from nonconformance such as damage to brand reputation, reduced customer loyalty, and decreased market share, leading to overall reduced revenue.
When these failures occur, organizations must move swiftly in order to focus on controlling nonconformance costs while taking rapid steps toward improvement. This is why you need to implement a total quality management program as a preventative or corrective measure in order to keep nonconformance costs low and maintain customer satisfaction.
10 Considerations When It Comes to Cost of Nonconformance.
Cost of nonconformance is a critical issue in business that often gets overlooked. Companies lose billions each year due to quality problems, defects, and customer dissatisfaction. Understanding and managing the cost of nonconformance can significantly impact a company’s bottom line and long-term success.
Many organizations struggle to quantify and address these hidden costs effectively. From manufacturing defects to customer service failures, the ripple effects of poor quality control can be far-reaching. Identifying key areas for improvement and implementing targeted solutions requires a strategic approach.
When it comes to cost of nonconformance, businesses can develop more robust quality management systems and reduce unnecessary expenses if they examine the below factors. The insights provided aim to help companies enhance their operational efficiency and deliver greater value to customers.
1) Increased Defect Rates
Organizations that struggle with nonconformance often face higher defect rates in their products or services. This can lead to a ripple effect of issues throughout the production process and beyond.
When defects increase, so does the need for rework, repairs, and replacements. These activities consume additional time, resources, and materials, driving up operational costs significantly.
Quality assurance becomes more challenging as defect rates rise. Inspection processes must be intensified, potentially slowing down production and increasing labor costs.
Customer satisfaction may suffer due to subpar products reaching the market. This can result in returns, complaints, and potential loss of repeat business.
Higher defect rates can also impact employee morale. Workers may become frustrated with the constant need to fix errors, leading to decreased productivity and job satisfaction.
To address this issue, companies often implement robust quality control measures. These might include enhanced training programs, improved process monitoring, and investment in advanced quality management systems.
2) Customer Dissatisfaction
Customer dissatisfaction is a critical factor in the cost of nonconformance. When products or services fail to meet expectations, customers may become frustrated and seek alternatives.
This can lead to lost business and damage to a company’s reputation. Negative feedback online can quickly spread, deterring potential customers and impacting sales.
Companies must address customer complaints promptly and effectively to minimize dissatisfaction. Implementing robust quality control measures can help prevent issues before they reach customers.
Poor customer service and unmet expectations are common causes of dissatisfaction. Businesses should focus on clear communication and setting realistic expectations to avoid disappointment.
Regular customer surveys and feedback analysis can help identify areas for improvement. By addressing these issues proactively, companies can reduce the costs associated with dissatisfied customers.
Training employees in effective customer service techniques is essential. This includes active listening, empathy, and problem-solving skills to handle customer concerns efficiently.
3) Regulatory Fines
Regulatory fines pose a significant risk for businesses that fail to comply with industry standards and regulations. These penalties can be substantial, often reaching millions of dollars for severe violations.
Companies face average non-compliance costs of $14.8 million, far exceeding the typical compliance spending of $5.47 million. This stark difference highlights the financial importance of adhering to regulations.
In recent years, regulatory bodies have become increasingly stringent. U.S. banks alone have been fined a staggering $243 billion since 2008. This trend shows no signs of slowing down, with global regulators levying nearly $10 billion in fines between 2018 and 2019.
Beyond the immediate financial impact, regulatory fines can damage a company’s reputation and erode customer trust. This long-term consequence may prove even more costly than the initial penalty.
To mitigate these risks, businesses should invest in robust compliance programs. Regular audits, employee training, and staying informed about regulatory changes can help prevent costly violations.
4) Scrap and Rework Costs
Scrap and rework costs are significant components of the cost of nonconformance. These expenses arise when products fail to meet quality standards and require additional processing or disposal.
Scrap costs occur when defective items cannot be salvaged and must be discarded. This wastes raw materials, labor, and production time. Companies often track scrap rates to measure quality performance.
Rework costs involve fixing defective products to meet specifications. This requires extra labor, materials, and machine time. It also disrupts production schedules and delays order fulfillment.
Reducing scrap and rework can lead to substantial savings. A company with $100 million in revenue could save $220,000 annually by cutting these costs by just 10%.
To minimize scrap and rework, organizations should focus on root cause analysis and process improvements. Implementing robust quality control measures and employee training can help prevent defects from occurring in the first place.
Tracking scrap and rework costs separately provides valuable insights into quality issues. This data can guide targeted improvement efforts and justify investments in quality initiatives.
5) Lost Market Share
Companies face serious consequences when they ignore quality issues. Poor product quality can drive customers away quickly. As word spreads about defects or failures, potential buyers choose competitors instead.
This loss of market share compounds over time. A manufacturer might see sales drop 5% in the first year after major quality problems. By year three, that could balloon to a 20% decline as reputation damage sets in.
Regaining lost market share is an uphill battle. It often requires major investments in product improvements and marketing. Some firms never fully recover their former position.
Industry leaders who prioritize quality tend to gain share at the expense of laggards. They attract customers looking for reliability and consistency. This creates a virtuous cycle of growth and reinvestment in quality processes.
Companies must weigh conformance costs against the risk of market share erosion. Implementing robust quality controls typically proves far less expensive than trying to win back departed customers.
6) Legal Liabilities
Legal liabilities can be a major factor in the cost of nonconformance for businesses. When products or services fail to meet required standards, companies may face lawsuits from customers, regulatory fines, or even criminal charges in severe cases.
One notable example is the Takata airbag recall. The company faced massive penalties and legal costs due to defective airbags linked to multiple deaths and injuries. This illustrates how quality issues can escalate into serious legal problems.
Businesses should consider potential legal expenses when evaluating their quality control processes. This includes costs for legal counsel, settlements, and court fees. Proactive measures to ensure compliance can help avoid these costly situations.
Companies may also need to factor in the expense of product recalls. Removing faulty items from the market can be extremely costly, but it’s often necessary to limit legal exposure. Implementing robust quality assurance programs can reduce the likelihood of recalls and associated legal risks.
7) Emergency Shipping Charges
Emergency shipping charges can significantly impact the cost of nonconformance for businesses. These unexpected fees often arise when companies need to expedite shipments due to quality issues or production delays.
One common scenario involves rushing replacement parts to customers when defective products are discovered. This not only incurs higher shipping costs but can also disrupt regular logistics operations.
Shipping companies may implement emergency charges with little notice, forcing businesses to absorb these expenses. These fees can sometimes double the standard shipping rates, especially during peak seasons or global disruptions.
To mitigate these costs, organizations should focus on improving quality control processes. By reducing defects and nonconformances, companies can minimize the need for emergency shipments.
Businesses should also consider negotiating agreements with shipping providers to cap emergency charges. This can help create more predictable costs even when urgent deliveries are necessary.
Maintaining safety stock of critical components can reduce reliance on emergency shipping. While this approach ties up capital, it can prove cost-effective in avoiding rush delivery fees.
8) Increased Warranty Claims
Warranty claims often increase when product quality issues arise. Companies may face significant financial burdens due to these claims.
Poor quality control can lead to more defective products reaching customers. This results in higher rates of returns and repairs under warranty.
Warranty expenses can quickly add up, impacting a company’s bottom line. Businesses must account for these costs in their financial planning.
Effective quality management is crucial to minimize warranty claims. Regular inspections and stringent testing procedures can help catch defects before products ship.
Customer satisfaction suffers when products fail prematurely. This can damage brand reputation and lead to lost sales.
Companies should analyze warranty claim data to identify recurring issues. This information can guide improvements in design and manufacturing processes.
Proactive measures, such as extended testing periods or enhanced quality checks, may initially increase costs. However, they can lead to long-term savings by reducing warranty claims.
9) Decreased Employee Morale
Low employee morale can be a significant consequence of high nonconformance costs. When quality issues persist, workers may feel frustrated and demoralized by constant rework and customer complaints.
This negative atmosphere can lead to decreased productivity and increased absenteeism. Employees might lose pride in their work, knowing that the products or services they produce often fail to meet standards.
Lack of enthusiasm and innovation becomes common in workplaces with frequent quality problems. Team members may stop suggesting improvements or taking initiative, feeling their efforts are futile.
High turnover rates often result from sustained low morale. Talented employees may seek opportunities elsewhere, leaving the company with less skilled workers and higher training costs.
Addressing nonconformance issues promptly can help prevent this downward spiral. By involving employees in quality improvement efforts, companies can boost morale and create a culture of excellence.
Regular communication about quality goals and progress can help staff feel more engaged and valued. Recognizing and rewarding quality achievements can also motivate employees to maintain high standards.
10) Supplier Penalties
Supplier penalties have become increasingly common in many industries. Companies often implement these penalties to ensure their suppliers meet quality standards and delivery deadlines.
These penalties can take various forms, such as financial charges or reduced future orders. Some businesses use a point system, where suppliers lose points for each nonconformance issue.
Retailers have made supplier delivery criteria more stringent in recent years. They’ve also increased financial penalties for nonconformance. This trend aims to improve supply chain efficiency and product quality.
Suppliers must carefully weigh the costs of conforming to standards against potential penalties. In some cases, investing in better quality control may be more cost-effective than paying repeated fines.
Effective communication between companies and their suppliers is crucial. Clear expectations and regular feedback can help reduce nonconformance issues and associated penalties.
Organizations should also consider the long-term impact of supplier penalties on their relationships. Overly harsh penalties may drive away valuable suppliers or lead to increased costs passed down to consumers.
Detailed Case Studies
Case studies provide valuable insights into how companies have successfully reduced nonconformance costs. These real-world examples demonstrate effective quality management strategies and their tangible impacts on businesses.
Successful Quality Management Strategies
A large automotive manufacturer implemented a comprehensive Six Sigma program to address quality issues. They focused on reducing defects in their assembly line process. The company trained employees at all levels in Six Sigma methodologies.
Key initiatives included:
- Standardizing work procedures
- Implementing statistical process control
- Introducing automated quality checks
Results were impressive. Defect rates dropped by 35% within the first year. This led to significant cost savings in rework and warranty claims.
Real-World Examples
A mid-sized electronics company faced high customer return rates due to product failures. They invested in an advanced quality management system. This system tracked defects throughout the production process.
The company also:
- Improved supplier quality control
- Enhanced product testing procedures
- Implemented a robust customer feedback loop
Within 18 months, customer returns decreased by 40%. The cost of non-conformance dropped from 15% to 8% of total revenue. This resulted in substantial savings and improved customer satisfaction.
Long-Term Implications
The costs of nonconformance can have far-reaching consequences beyond immediate financial losses. Companies that consistently fail to meet quality standards may face severe repercussions in the market, affecting their reputation and customer relationships.
Market Share Loss
Businesses that struggle with quality issues often see their market share shrink over time. Customers tend to gravitate towards competitors offering more reliable products or services. For example, a smartphone manufacturer plagued by defective batteries might lose a significant portion of its customer base to rivals.
This loss can compound quickly. As word spreads about quality problems, potential new customers may avoid the brand altogether. In some cases, entire market segments can become inaccessible.
Companies may find themselves spending more on marketing and sales efforts just to maintain their current position. This diverts resources from other critical areas like research and development or customer service.
Brand Reputation Damage
A company’s brand is one of its most valuable assets. Quality issues can severely tarnish a brand’s image, sometimes taking years to recover. High-profile recalls or product failures often make headlines, causing lasting damage.
Negative reviews and social media discussions can spread rapidly, amplifying the impact of quality problems. Even minor issues, if frequent enough, can erode trust over time.
Rebuilding a damaged reputation is costly and time-consuming. It often requires extensive PR campaigns, improved customer service, and demonstrable quality improvements. Some brands never fully recover from major quality-related scandals.
Customer Loyalty Erosion
Loyal customers are the backbone of many successful businesses. They provide steady revenue and often act as brand ambassadors. However, repeated quality issues can test even the most devoted customers’ patience.
Each negative experience chips away at customer loyalty. Frustrated customers may not only switch to competitors but also actively discourage others from using the product or service.
Regaining lost customers is significantly more expensive than retaining existing ones. It requires targeted marketing campaigns, special offers, and often product improvements. The cost of these efforts can far exceed the initial savings from cutting corners on quality.
Quantitative Analysis Techniques
Quantitative analysis is crucial for measuring and understanding the cost of nonconformance. Organizations use various methods to gather and interpret data related to quality issues.
One common technique is statistical process control (SPC). This involves tracking key metrics over time to identify trends and anomalies in production processes.
Another useful approach is Pareto analysis. It helps prioritize quality issues by identifying the “vital few” problems causing the majority of defects or costs.
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a proactive method. It assesses potential failure modes in a system or process and their impact on quality and costs.
Root cause analysis digs deep into quality problems. It uses tools like fishbone diagrams to uncover underlying causes of nonconformance.
Cost-benefit analysis compares the investment in quality improvement to potential savings. This helps justify quality initiatives to management.
Data cleaning is an essential step before analysis. It ensures accuracy and reliability of the data used for decision-making.
Organizations may also employ data visualization tools. These create charts and graphs to make complex quality data more understandable and actionable.
Regression analysis can reveal relationships between variables. It helps predict future nonconformance costs based on historical data and process changes.
Final thoughts
In quality control terms, non-conformance leaves companies exposed to quality issues that can create legal liabilities and customer dissatisfaction as well as lost time and money due to returns or rework.
Imagine if you could measure the cost of nonconformance – this would be a huge help to organizations everywhere, allowing them to identify and reduce the cost of poor quality. Unfortunately, it’s not always easy to do this.
But measuring the cost of nonconformance is essential for businesses looking to improve their quality management processes and ensure they remain compliant with industry standards while still providing customers with satisfactory products and services.
There are many factors that contribute to the cost of nonconformance, and it can be difficult to isolate and quantify them all, this is what leads to significant loss and costs.
Implementing a formal Quality Management System (QMS), monitoring suppliers closely, and investing in employee training are all important steps organizations should take when trying to reduce their risk from poor-quality products or services.
Ultimately, an effective quality management system should make sure that quality standards are met, so these costly issues can be avoided altogether. Making sure quality systems are in place to reduce the risk of non-conformance and its associated costs should be a top priority for all businesses.
By understanding these five measuring tactics and taking a process approach toward managing quality in your organization you will be able to effectively address issues surrounding non-conformance quickly before any significant losses occur.
FAQ
What are the costs of non-conformance?
When quality management processes fail to satisfy quality control expectations, non-conformance can have serious financial consequences. A business may have to pay costs such as supplier quality penalties, increased expenses for further quality checks, as well as additional costs for investigation and corrective action.
It’s also important not to forget about potential losses due to reputational damage and customer complaints. Moreover, there is a time investment cost, associated with the extra quality assurance steps and processes that need implementing in the event of any non-conformance.
Therefore, it’s essential for project managers to be proactive in identifying quality issues and ensuring that all processes are effectively delivering quality results on time.
What is the difference between the cost of conformance and the cost of non-conformance?
In quality management, it is important to understand the difference between the cost of conformance (COC) and the cost of nonconformance (CONC).
COC is the amount of time, money, and resources invested in staying within quality standards, i.e what it costs to do quality activities right. Whereas CONC is what happens when quality standards are not met resulting in instability and lower-quality products.
Conformance encompasses quality controls conducted throughout the development process, such as testing and inspections, to ensure quality standards are met. Nonconformance is the cost associated with an acceptable quality level, or AQL – when quality processes fail and do not meet pre-defined quality specifications.
Understanding the impact of COC versus CONC can give project managers an appreciation of proactive quality initiatives designed to ensure successful quality performance while avoiding detrimental impacts from missed quality standards.
Though it can seem counterintuitive, oftentimes investing upfront in quality assurance can result in considerable savings later when costly errors or re-works are averted.
What are the 4 types of quality management?
Quality control influences customer satisfaction and the overall costs of products or services, hence it is an essential part of any project. Quality management can be broken down into four types:
- Quality control – This monitors and evaluates actual performance against quality requirements and standards to identify variances from the design intent. It involves understanding what quality should look like and making sure that you’re meeting those quality standards at every stage of a product or service.
- Quality assurance – This ensures that quality requirements are incorporated into the product or service throughout the development process. The goal is to prevent quality issues from occurring in the first place.
- Quality improvement – This looks at continuously improving quality over time through targeted actions that reduce costs and improve quality for customers. It focuses on continuous improvements to increase production efficiency, resulting in improved quality.
- Quality planning and management – Quality planning identifies ways for quality standards to be met by developing objectives, tasks, and processes that must be completed before executing a product or service. Quality management brings all of these pieces together and emphasizes, keeping the customer happy at all times with a focus on quality throughout the entire system.
What are the 5 principles of quality management?
Quality management systems are the cornerstone of quality improvement and customer satisfaction. Whether focusing on a product, service, or process output, quality management principles remain pertinent.
The five essential quality management principles are – customer focus, quality-oriented leadership, continuous improvement and learning, process-oriented approach, and systematic quality management.
These principles form the basic foundation of quality assurance efforts in any organization and must be used in both planning and execution to ensure success in quality outcomes. By embracing these core concepts in quality management, organizations can guarantee progress toward their original goals for quality assurance and greater customer satisfaction.